ICIL 2019 - 9th International Conference on Information Law and EthicsNews | 27-07-2018 10:45
ICIL 2019 9th International Conference on Information Law and Ethics
Psychological and socio-political dynamics within the Web: new and old challenges to Information Law and Ethics
University of Rome, Tor Vergata and Pontifical University St. Anselm, Rome
Chair of the Scientific Committee: Maria Bottis
Co-Chairs Prof. Marco Innamorati and Dr. Antonio Marturano
11-13 July 2019 Rome, Italy
Call for Papers and Panels
Social media are playing an increasing importance in people everyday use of the Internet. They facilitate the creation and sharing of information, ideas, career interests and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks such as Twitter of Facebook. On the other hand social media are carriers of a range of positive and negative impacts of social media use. Social media can help to improve individuals' sense of connectedness with real or online communities, and social media can be an effective communication (or marketing) tool for corporations, entrepreneurs, nonprofit organizations, including advocacy groups and political parties and governments.
At the same time, concerns have been raised about possible links between heavy social media use and depression, and even the issues of cyberbullying, online harassment and “trolling”. Moreover, political uses of social media have been questioned: The New York Times (Rosenberg and al., 2018) and The Guardian (Adams, 2018) recently reported on the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica data breach, in which the company used for political purposes personal information acquired about Facebook users, by an external researcher who claimed to be collecting it for academic purposes. The personal data of about 50 million Facebook users were acquired via the 270,000 Facebook users who explicitly chose to share their data with the app “thisisyourdigitallife”. By giving this third-party app permission to acquire their data, back in 2015, this also gave the app access to information on the user's friends network; this resulted in the data of about 50 million users, the majority of whom had not explicitly given Cambridge Analytica permission to access their data, being collected (Dwoskin and Romm, 2018). The app developer breached Facebook's terms of service by giving the data to Cambridge Analytica (Roose, 2018).
Moreover, health professionals and researchers around the world noticed that excessive use of digital technology, like social media, by (not only) adolescents can cause disruptions in their physical and mental health, such as mood disturbances (Best, Manktelow and Taylor, 2014), Facebook addiction disorder (Brailovskaia and Margraf, 2017), in sleeping patterns, their weight and levels of exercise and notably in their school performance. Research has continued to demonstrate that long hours spent on mobile devices have shown a positive relationship with an increase in teenagers' BMI and a lack of physical activity (Ferguson, and al., 2012). Moreover, excessive internet usage has been linked to lower grades compared to users who don't spend an excessive amount of time online, even with a control over age, gender, race, parent education and personal contentment factors that may affect the study (Kim and al., 2017).
These phenomena are not new in the history of the Web, neither in the history of mass-media (Poster, 2006); they are chameleonic problems that re-emerge in new forms as long as the web dynamically changes together the way in which society shifts the way to use the Web and therefore they provide old and new challenges for Information Law and Ethics.
References: Adams, (2018): “Facebook’s week of shame: the Cambridge Analytica fallout”, The Guardian, 24 March, retrieved https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/24/facebook-week-of-shame-data-breach-observer-revelations-zuckerberg-silence;
Brailovskaia and Margraf (2017): “Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students—A longitudinal approach”, PLOS ONE, 12(12), retrieved http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189719;
Dwoskin and Romm (2018): “Facebook’s rules for accessing user data lured more than just Cambridge Analytica”, The Washington Post, 19 March, retrieved https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/facebooks-rules-for-accessing-user-data-lured-more-than-just-cambridge-analytica/2018/03/19/31f6979c-658e-43d6-a71f-afdd8bf1308b_story.html?utm_term=.c5d2cb9010b9;
Ferguson, and al. (2012): “Concurrent and Prospective Analyses of Peer, Television and Social Media Influences on Body Dissatisfaction, Eating Disorder Symptoms and Life Satisfaction in Adolescent Girls”, J Youth Adolescence, 43: 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9898-9;
Kim and al. (2017): “The associations between internet use time and school performance among Korean adolescents differ according to the purpose of internet use”, PLOS ONE, 12(4), retrieved http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174878;
Poster (2006): “The Good, the Bad and the Virtual”, in Poster, M., Information Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of Digital Machines, Durtham (NC): Duke University Press, pp.139-160;
Roose (2018): “How Facebook’s Data Sharing Went From Feature to Bug”, The New York Times, March 20, retrieved https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/facebook-data-sharing.html;
Rosenberg and al. (2018): “How Trump Consultants Exploited the Facebook Data of Millions”, The New York Times, March 18, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html.
We welcome papers on intellectual property, data protection, freedom of information, individual rights and information, privacy, cyberbullism, online harassment, trolling, cyberlaw and cyberethics, media law and ethics, digital divide and information technology, e-government, surveillance, intellectual freedom, open access, digital divide and other. We are also particularly interested in papers on the historical development of information laws and ethical theory and we would also consider papers dealing with the social, political or psychological aspects of information. Papers on cognate topics are also welcomed.
Abstracts due: December 16, 2018
Notification of accepted papers: January 13, 2019
Deadline for final papers due: April 24, 2019
Paper length: min. 8 pages max. 15 pages.
Abstract length: 500-800 words.
All abstracts and papers will be reviewed (double blind review).
We also invite panel proposals on hot social media topics as highlighted in the CFP. Complete sessions (1h 15”) may take the form of panels or roundtables. A panel consists of 3-4 presenters, each speaking for approximately 15 mins, with 15 minutes left for discussion. Roundtables consist of five or more participants who speak briefly (6-8 mins) and emphasize discussion among themselves and with the audience.
In the Email Header: Please put “Complete Session” in the subject line, followed by a brief title OR the name of the association/regional group
Please attach the following information as a Word or RTF document.
1. session title
2. the chair and affiliation (if any),
3. association/group name (if any),
4. each of the presenters, citing name, affiliation (if any), and title of paper in quotation marks.
5. Abstract overview of session submission (250 – 300 words)
6. A/V requirements: please indicate none or yes; if yes, please specify the equipment required.
In addition, please provide the following information for each presenter:
Name and affiliation (if any)
Title of paper
Abstract (250 – 300 words)
Brief biography (60 word limit)
Deadline for panel proposals: December 16, 2018
Notification of accepted Panels: April 30, 2019
Abstracts, papers and paper submissions should be sent to: email@example.com